Legislature(2011 - 2012)
2012-04-10 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2012-04-10 House Journal Page 2313 HB 296 The following was read the second time: HOUSE BILL NO. 296 "An Act relating to service of process on prisoners; relating to the crime of escape; relating to the definition of 'correctional facility'; amending Rule 4, Alaska Rules of Civil Procedure; and providing for an effective date." with the: Journal Page JUD RPT CS(JUD) NT 4DP 1NR 1612 FN1: ZERO(COR) 1612 FN2: ZERO(LAW) 1612 FN3: INDETERMINATE(ADM) 1612 FIN RPT CS(JUD) NT 4DP 5NR 2177 FN1: ZERO(COR) 2178 FN3: INDETERMINATE(ADM) 2178 FN4: ZERO(LAW) 2178 Representative Austerman moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 296(JUD) "An Act relating to service of process on prisoners; relating to the crime of escape; deleting the repeal of a provision relating to electronic monitoring as a special condition of probation and parole for offenders whose offense was related to a criminal street gang; amending Rule 4, Alaska Rules of Civil Procedure; and providing for an effective date." There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Austerman moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 296(JUD) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. 2012-04-10 House Journal Page 2314 CSHB 296(JUD) was read the third time. The question being: "Shall CSHB 296(JUD) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 296(JUD) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 32 NAYS: 5 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Austerman, Chenault, Cissna, Costello, Doogan, Edgmon, Fairclough, Feige, Foster, Gara, Gardner, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Herron, Holmes, Johansen, Johnson, Joule, Kawasaki, Kerttula, Lynn, Miller, Munoz, Olson, Petersen, Pruitt, Saddler, Seaton, Thomas, Thompson, Tuck, P.Wilson Nays: Keller, Millett, Neuman, Stoltze, T.Wilson Excused: Gatto Absent: Dick, Hawker And so, CSHB 296(JUD) passed the House. Representative Austerman moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the court rule change. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Austerman moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 296(JUD) was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.